Authors are invited to submit their contributions in form of high quality articles for SchoRes conference proceedings and journals. Articles must present original and unpublished work that is not under consideration elsewhere. Each submission will be peer-reviewed by at least two reviewers. Article review process needs a lot of effort and time on part of our reviewers and the admin staff. Authors repeatedly failing to publish articles with us after acceptance will be barred from submitting their articles for future SchoRes conference proceedings and journals.
Article Formatting
SchoRes only accepts papers in Microsoft Word format. Submitted papers must strictly conform to the SchoRes Article Template. Please note that the articles not conforming to the prescribed template will not be considered for a review. SchoRes Article Template in Microsoft Word format can be downloaded using the link below.
All author submissions will be accepted through IOARP Editorial System (IES) at www.IES.ioarp.org. To be able to submit an article for a review in SchoRes journals and conferences, authors will be required to use their IES Author Account.
IES Author Account provides authors with facilities such as: online submission of articles to SchoRes conferences and journals; access reviewer decisions and feedback; communicate with the Editors and TPC Chairs; upload updated or camera ready versions of their articles; upload copyright forms and receipts of payments, and access their article submission history. Once created, the IES Author Account can be used for all future submissions to SchoRes conferences and journals.
To submit a paper, please login to your IES Author Account. Select Submit Paper option from the top menu, enter authorship and paper details, select your desired conference or journal from the list of open conferences or journals, upload your article in Microsoft Word Format, and click 'Submit Paper' button to submit your paper. You will receive a confirmation email after submission and your submitted article will be instantly available under the Submission History section of your IES Author Account. To read more about the IES Author Account, or to submit your article visit IOARP Editorial System at www.IES.ioarp.org or click the button below.
Copyright Transfer Form
For the articles to be published on Global Digital Library at www.GlobalDigitalLibrary.com,at least one of the authors of every accepted article will be required to submit a Copyright Transfer Form to the TPC chair or the editor of a respective conference or journal. Articles without a duly signed Copyright Transfer Form will not be included in the conference proceedings or journals. Completed forms should be submitted to the TPC Chair of the respective conferences using IES Author Account.
SchoRes
Publishing is committed to abiding by ethical standards and best practices in its publication of
articles of the highest quality. As part of this commitment, SchoRes Publishing
strives to uphold the standards of the Committee on Publication Ethics
(COPE). SchoRes Publish believes that ethical publishing requires the active
participation of all parties in the process – authors, peer reviewers, editors, and the publisher – and in the
pursuit of this principle, SchoRes Publishing expects compliance with the
Standards for Publication Ethics set forth below:
1.1. Principles
to which authors should adhere
Present original material that transparently
shows the research process and fully reveals the value their research
brings to the literature. To ensure originality upon publication, authors
should not concurrently submit the same article or research to more than
one publication.
Ensure that any work presented as original is
in fact original, which requires adding citations for all or part of any
work that originated with other authors, and also adding quotation marks
to any text that originated with other authors. The inclusion in an
article of plagiarized text is never acceptable.
Provide in each article sufficient detail,
including the raw data used to support the conclusions made in the
article, to enable professionals in relevant field to attempt to replicate
the article’s findings and conclusions. Results of tests and other research
should be presented in the article directly and honestly, free from
falsity, fabrication, or other inappropriate manipulation. The
inclusion in an article of fraudulent data or knowingly inaccurate
statements is never acceptable.
Conduct research for each article in an
ethical and responsible manner that complies with relevant legislation and
applicable industry rules and guidelines.
Provide retractions or corrections to an
article promptly upon discovery or notification (and verification) of
inaccuracies in the article.
Include with each article submitted for
publication a complete and accurate list of reliable sources for all facts
in the article.
Disclose in each article all actual or
perceived conflicts of interest, including as posed by any funding sources
for the article.
Ensure accurate attribution of authorship for
each article, with all listed authors having made a significant
contribution to the research and/or article, and all individuals who made
a significant contribution to the research and/or article properly included
as co-authors. Authors should take collective responsibility for all
articles they submit and all articles they publish.
1.2. Principles
to which peer reviewers should adhere
Review all articles objectively, without bias
or favouritism based upon the origin of the article, the gender, race,
national origin, ethnicity, religious or political beliefs, sexual
orientation, or age of the authors, or commercial considerations.
Review articles solely in subject areas in
which they have expertise. Peer reviewers should provide the publisher
with professional credentials that accurately and truthfully represent
their expertise.
Before consenting to review an article, ensure
sufficient time and resource availability to complete a comprehensive
assessment of the article in a timely manner.
Decline to review articles that create a
conflict of interest, or the appearance thereof, which can arise from the
content of the article, its authors and/or its funders. In the event of
uncertainty, peer reviewers should disclose the potential conflict of
interest to the publisher and seek advice before proceeding further with a
review.
Provide reviews that are constructive and
impartial, devoid of any hostile, inflammatory, libellous, unfair, or
unnecessarily derogatory comments.
During and after the peer review process,
maintain the confidentiality of unpublished articles, including by
refraining from discussing them with others.
Refrain from using research or information
contained in unpublished articles for any purpose, including for personal
gain or for the advantage or disadvantage of any other person or
organization.
Promptly disclose to an article’s editor that
the article has not properly cited its sources, or contains errors or
material omissions.
1.3. Principles
to which editors should adhere
Decide whether to accept or reject articles
based solely on their scholarly or journalistic merit, which includes
their importance, originality, clarity, and relevance to the conference or
journal’s mission and purview.
Maintain objectivity and balance in the review
of all articles, acting without bias or favouritism based on the
origin of an article, an author’s gender, race, national origin,
ethnicity, religious or political beliefs, sexual orientation, or age, or
on the grounds of commercial considerations.
Adhere to the same rules governing conflict of
interest and improper use of unpublished articles as peer reviewers.
Guide authors and peer reviewers on their
responsibilities, and oversee their performance of those responsibilities,
ensuring that the authors and peer reviewers understand what is expected
of them.
Adopt editorial policies that promote
comprehensive, honest and ethical reporting.
Seek assurances that research has been in
conformity with the rules or guidelines of the applicable regulatory or
industry bodies, while recognizing that such approval is not a guarantee
of ethical conduct.
Preserve the anonymity of peer reviewers and
the confidentiality of unpublished articles.
Pursue suspected and alleged misconduct in the
research, writing, submission, acceptance and/or rejection, review, and
publication process, to protect the integrity of the conference or
journal. Editors should not simply reject submissions that raise concerns
about potential misconduct; they must make reasonable efforts to ensure a
proper investigation is conducted and the issue resolved.
Upon identifying errors or material omissions
in an article, promptly communicate corrections, retractions and/or
revisions, as applicable, to the publisher, and in the case of an
unpublished article also to the author.
1.4. Principles
to which the publisher should adhere
Uphold rigorous standards of publication
ethics to maintain the integrity of the conference or journal.
Provide the resources and institutional
support needed to publish accurate, original and important articles,
including, as necessary, specialized legal counsel and review for issues
of libel, copyright, and infringement.
Ensure appropriate policies are in place to
provide guidance, address and resolve editorial conflicts of interest.
Cease publication of any content that is not
in accordance with these Standards for Publication Ethics.
Promptly publish corrections, clarifications,
revisions, retractions, and apologies, if and when the need arises, and
with due prominence.
Maintain the independence of editorial
decisions, which should not be altered or influenced by commercial
considerations or business needs.